Master Tourism Destination Management

/in /by

Description Link for best Dissertation: http://www.tourism-master.com/research/ 11/15/2019 Writers Hub – Freelance Writing https://www.writershub.org/writer/orders/498619#instructions 5/7 writing instruction: Must flow Handbook Master Dissertation Master in Tourism Destination Management, Topic: “Challenges of Real Estate Sectors for Tourism Development in Scheveningen, The Netherlands” Goals and Research Question (stay with this) RQ1 What is the relationship between tourism development and real estate markets in beach resorts? RQ2 What has been the impact of tourism development on stakeholders related to the real estate markets in Scheveningen during the last 10 years? RQ3 What measures can be taken to enhance the positive impacts of tourism development on real estate markets in Scheveningen? 

English Language and Linguistics

/in /by

Description

ASSIGNMENT

1: Report on variation in British EnglishQuestion 1: Accent variation in the BBC Voices Project Resources: BBC Voices recordings: http://sounds.bl.uk/Accents-and-dialects/BBC-Voices/ Focusing on 2-3 selected pronunciation features (e.g. glottal stop, TH-fronting, BATH, STRUT, FACE vowels, etc.), listen to and analyse a selection of BBC Voices clips (minimum 10). You can select the geographical region from the drop-down list. Your report should include at least the following: (i) a summary of what you observed in the clips, e.g. a table of which speakers do or do not have a certain feature; (ii) if applicable, a discussion of whether the results of your study correspond to what the Trudgill reading and the course textbook describe; (iii) a discussion of which social features (age, gender, etc) seem to relate to the use of certain pronunciation features. You might find that there is no difference across, e.g., genders, but this is fine (and you should report that you found no difference). You may want to pay attention to more than one ‘token’ per speaker for a given feature, as individuals do vary. 

Service Marketing Pitch

/in /by

Description

Your task is to identify a real service organisation that has a problem with one of the 7Ps or how they are evaluated, and then pitch a solution to that problem to the organisation’s board (i.e., your tutor and classmates). You will have a maximum of four minutes to (1) succinctly identify the organisation’s problem, (2) convince the board that you have a potential solution to this problem, and (3) justify why your solution is optimal in relation to services marketing theor

Philosophy and the Nature of Morality

/in /by

Description

In his work, Ethics: A Contemporary Introduction, Harry Gensler offers some critiques of cultural relativism and moral subjectivism. After reading the introduction and first two chapters of this book, write an essay consisting of two main parts. The first part (between 500 and 750 words) should be devoted to answering this question: What are the main problems with cultural relativism and subjectivism? The second part of the essay (between 750 to 1000 words) should be devoted to either defending or arguing against Gensler’s understanding of relativism and subjectivism. In the course of your argument, you must also compare Gensler’s view with at least one other view of the nature of ethics. In order to be considered acceptable, your essay must incorporate at least two (ideally three to four) other academic sources in addition to the Ethics: A Contemporary Introduction. 

Critiquing the concept of evidence-based programs and their connection to theory.

/in /by

Description Instructions This week is divided into two sections. First, you will focus on defining, refining, and critiquing the concept of evidence-based programs and their connection to theory. Having read and reviewed these resources, prepare a reflection paper on evidence-based programs and practices. Be sure your paper addresses the following: Include a definition of evidence-based programs. Determine how these programs draw from theory. Identify appropriate questions and their elements used in choosing an evidence-based program. Include an explanation of an evidence continuum that you consider valid when reviewing your topic in health psychology. Part 1: Define and Refine Do a practice run using the resources this week and focus on three major elements: Identify the evidence-based theories being discussed. Define them. Indicate which questions the researchers proposed that drew them to the theories. Discuss how the topic is reinterpreted from these theories. Part 2: Critique Evidence-Based Programs Finally, pick a research paper that you have previously reviewed, and then review the same three elements discussed above: Identify the evidence-based theories being discussed. Define them. Indicate which questions the researchers proposed that drew them to the theories. Discuss how the topic is reinterpreted from these theories. Part 1 Length: 3 pages, not including title and reference pages Part 2 Length: 3 pages, not including title and reference pages Total Length of Part 1 and Part 2: 6 pages, not including title and reference pages References: Include three to five scholarly previous resources.

Comparison between Florida’s legislative framework and any other state

/in /by

The ten page paper will offer a comparison between Florida’s legislative framework and another state of the student’s choosing. Possible sections might include, but are not limited to: elections, lawmaker responsibilities, committee structure, lawmaker composition, ethics, fundraising, scandals, partisanship in the process, impact on term limits or lack thereof, successes, failures, budgeting, history, and future changes.